Free software allows incredible freedom to the end user. Gpl code buried deep in software could give rise to a demand that you release your source code. Using gpl licensed packages in a commercial product ros. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis licensed under the gnu general public license. Software licensed under the gnu general public license is free software, and all software that builds on gpllicensed components is also free and must also be licensed under the gpl. The implication is that gpled software is not necessarily free from cost, and therefore you can in fact license your programs under the gpl and still sell them for money. Gpl license is also commercial, in the sense that you can buysell software licensed by it. Neither does the gpl state that the source code has to be made public. All the gpl ensures that if you want to make a proprietary fork of the software, its original author has to. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. You may obtain the complete corresponding source code from us for a period of three years after our last shipment of this product, which will be no earlier than 20110801, by sending a money order or. It is therefore often thought that gpllicensed software is unsuitable for proprietary projects. The creative commons attributionsharealike international license version 4. Not at allthere are many other free software licenses.
Richard stallman created the gpl to protect the gnu software from being made proprietary. The gnu general public license permits making a modified version and letting the public access it on a server without ever releasing its source code to the public. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software. Software can become incompatible with secondary licenses in one of two ways. Ffmpeg is licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl version 2. Because wordpress is licensed by the general public license gpl and is an open source software oss project, any themes or plugins also follow the gpl licensing structure. Opensource software can also be commercialized from selling services, such as training, technical support, or consulting, rather than the software itself another possibility is offering opensource software in source code form only, while providing executable binaries to paying customers only, offering the commercial service of compiling and packaging. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software. Wordpress gpl commercial themes and plugins dummies. This, by the way, is almost certainly the reason that black duck is blogging about it.
Most gpl version 2 software is actually licensed as gpl version 2 or any later version, or. Hi, using a gpl licensed package in a commercial product should not be a problem, right. Sep 03, 2016 gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. But the gpl itself is compatible with a capitalist society. I again dont so much care about the ethics bsds just fine as i do about the commercial impact. It ought not force us to release all our own software in the product under the gpl. It restricts you from using software to build non gpl software including bsdlicensed free software, but it prevents software from being taken private by commercial developers. The gpl is tactically less free, but strategically more free. The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. This is explained in subsections 6a and 6b of the gpl.
Aug 26, 2008 early gpl enforcement efforts began soon after the gpl was written by richard stallman in 1989, and consisted of informal community efforts, often in public usenet discussions. Jan 16, 2004 despite the critical role the gpl plays in the advance of linux, not many people understand its terms. The software that i am refering to is qgis which provides this description. But the wording of both the license and the faq is misleading, and the suggestion that you can gpl your commercial software is disingenuous. Dont believe the hype, agpl open source licensing is toxic. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and.
Many of the popular theme and plugin providers in the commercial wordpress space are compliant with the gpl, and you can feel comfortable knowing that the software they. Gpl the gnu general public license the gpl is a copyleft software licence 1 published by the usbased free software foundation. It is a specific implementation of his copyleft concept. Nov 10, 2005 the gnu general public license v2 gpl v2 for short is the most commonly used open source licence. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it. Wikipedias content is mostly under the creative commons bysa license, which has similar sharealike features to the gpl. Commercial software was once considered to be proprietary software, but now a number of free and opensource software applications are licensed or sold to end users. Gnu general public license, version 3 spdx short identifier. A copy of that license is included in this document on page x. The software included in this product contains ed software that is licensed under the gpl. Since nodes communicate via tcp and live in completely separate processes and hence are separate binaries, i do not think the gpl can cross the process boundary and infect.
A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. All the gpl ensures that if you want to make a proprietary fork of the software, its original author has to be made part of the equation. Im not sure you would like to do that, as your entire application would have to be licensed under the gpl. Jun 21, 2016 some of the mostinstalled open source software is gpllicensed, such as linux, wordpress, and wikipedias underlying software, mediawiki. The gnu gpl license therefore requires that such scripts if published are being shared under a. As a free software license, much of the stewardship and support for the gpl has been driven by the free software foundation.
This is what the gpls copyleft clause is known for. I have a concern of using gpl v2 and gpl v3 licensed software in commercial production environment. The second version agplv2 was published in november 2007, as a transitional license to allow an. If you sell a product with an embedded gpl software linux or sell a complete bootable image, you need to provide the source code for all that gpl software youre selling. Government computer software acquisition and the gnu. I wont modify anything from source code and the architecture of the system requires the use of a load balancer.
Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. Gpl is the acronym for gnus general public license, and its one of the most popular open source licenses. Gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. Top 10 gnu gpl license questions answered whitesource. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source code becomes available to the community.
The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. Sep 05, 2017 this, by the way, is almost certainly the reason that black duck is blogging about it. Approximately 70% of the projects in the software repository sourceforge use the gpl v2. You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changesdates of in source files and keep modifications under gpl. Commercial software is any software or program that is designed and developed for licensing or sale to end users or that serves a commercial purpose. However, businesses using gnu software in commercial activity, and people doing public ftp distribution, should need to check the real english gpl. The gpl faq list states explicitly that one can ask for license fees for software under the gpl see, e. Honestly, i would try to avoid the gpl anywhere you can. The gnu gpl is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. After all, the agpl must be the open source gift that keeps on giving to a company that makes money by first. Columnist matt asay explains the gpl and how it relates to traditional law, and explores how commercial software developers can legally benefit from this exceptional license. When distributing derived works, the source code of the work must be made available under the same license. Dont believe the hype, agpl open source licensing is. Brian terrell founded gpl technologies in 2003 and has guided its development as a leading independent provider of it solutions to the media and entertainment industry.
Jul 24, 2018 when the copyleft agpl was first published, many leaders in the open source community had something to say about the issue of a supposed loophole in the gpl open source license that allowed saas companies to integrate gpl open source libraries without sharing their code. Today, brian focuses on the companys strategic direction, industry leadership, innovation and improving customer experience. The licence of software included in ubuntu can not discriminate against anyone or any group of users and cannot restrict users from using the software for a particular field of endeavour a business for example. As much as i love the work of the free software foundation, their focus has ultimately been anchored from the perspective that software absolutely has to be 100% free. Some features, such as support for some external libraries libx264 and libx265 for example and various filters, are covered by the gnu general public license gpl version 2 or later see commercial x264 license exception below. In some senses, thats very permissive because the aggregate permissiveness is maximized. It restricts you from using software to build nongpl software including bsdlicensed free software, but it prevents software from being taken private by commercial developers. Question on importing a gpled python library in commercial code.
If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporatecommercial environment. Feb 25, 2006 advocates of the gnu general public license gnu gpl like to perpetuate the idea that programs released under it are free as in speech, not free as in beer. If i understand it correctly, if we use a secret message format that we dont explain to anyone we. This is what the gpl s copyleft clause is known for. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. Maybe what you want is a proprietary license as opposed to free as in speech license. If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporate commercial environment. The remainder of this white paper provides an overview of the gpls salient features and how those features relate to dfars software acquisitions. You have the right to use the program for any purpose. From a users point of view, of course, gpls restrictions arent really restrictions. By using the image, youd have to force your entire application under the gpl. The gnu general public license presents the gpls features, the di. The gpl guarantees everyone with the software identical permissions.
The first version of the affero general public license agplv1, was published by affero, inc. Apr 17, 2010 the gpl is tactically less free, but strategically more free. The affero general public license affero gpl and informally affero license is a free software license. So we will not distribute software that is licensed freely for non commercial use. Lawyers for commercial software vendors have feared a claim like this for essentially the entire 20oddyear lifetime of the gpl. Additionally, i am using the commercial license of emgucv which needs to be installed on the os for it to work also, appreciate ur opinion and time. When using larger packages, be sure to check not only the license for that package, but for all the. This can be further shortened to gpl, when it is understood that the gnu gpl is the one intended. Another point about the title of your question can i use gpl software bina ries in co mmercial environment. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. Nov 19, 20 this is explained in subsections 6a and 6b of the gpl. As long as were not linking directly towards the package, but rather just send or receive messages from it, that is. Using gpllicensed components in proprietary projects. In fact, gpl can be the basis for making money with floss software, by offering non gpl d commercial licenses.
Just because you require a piece of gpl software in order to function, as long as the gpl component is standalone, i do not believe your software also needs to be gpl. In fact, gpl can be the basis for making money with floss software, by offering nongpld commercial licenses. The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. I would like to use haproxy as a load balancing solution. Some of the mostinstalled open source software is gpllicensed, such as linux, wordpress, and wikipedias underlying software, mediawiki. The more free software well have in commercial environments, the less hassle well have to fix issues in production. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. Sharing or selling blender addons python scripts blenders python api is an integral part of the software, used to define the user interface or develop tools for example. Oracle offers a commercial license for all of its mysql software that is embedded in or bundled with another application. There are multiple variants of the gnu gpl, each with different requirements. The following licenses are in use for r or associated software such as packages. What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses.
Since the source code is universally available, there are also many more chances for bugs to be caught and fixed. That does not mean the new library must be all lgpl software, just that you comply with the lgpl license terms to be able to distribute the lgpl. It is the licensees and only the licensees who must be granted assess to the source code. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a.
The commercial license allows oems, isvs and vars to distribute commercial binaries of mysql software with their own commercial software without subjecting that software to the gpl and its requirement to distribute source. The most widespread such license is the gnu general public license, or gnu gpl for short. Software covered by gpl is always ed, and the gpl spells out the restrictions on the softwares copying and distribution. This document attempts to draw together the main features of the gnu general public license v2 into a friendly and comprehensible digest and, in addition, to. Lgpl software your api would be considered a derivative work and the new library would then be subject to the same compliance terms as the original software. When a program is licensed under the gnu general public license the gpl.
632 685 559 336 1505 1201 1106 316 659 1279 1298 758 583 1244 617 396 729 1414 1297 1412 1201 1167 1135 966 572 1346 1251 927 429 282 1391 487 1472 383 394 1468 713 78 1257 32 443 1036 665 1213